Writing a literature review for a PhD thesis and for journal submission has different purposes, which deeply influences how each is approached. The literature review in the PhD is comprehensive in nature. It is the base upon which the whole thesis will be based. It considers a wide array of sources to reflect broad knowledge of the area and offers critical depth regarding how the current studies will inform the new study. This review should not only indicate what has been done but also gaps your research tries to fill, thus providing it with a supportive narrative for your general argument and methodology.
On the other hand, a literature review intended for journal submission is concise, usually focused on one research question or hypothesis, and tailored to the audience and scope of that specific journal. Here, clarity and brevity are key, since you would want to keep the readers appraised as quickly and succinctly as possible. It does not aim at coverage, per se-aspects of relevant literature-but rather synthesis. There is, therefore, a need for an incisive analytical mind that does some critiquing of extant studies and brings out the significance of findings against a backdrop of more immediate concern.
The actual writing of my literature review was somewhat overwhelming in an attempt to balance depth with clarity. To make life easier, I ordered services from thesiswriters.top . They helped me in structuring my review in such a way that my arguments would flow logically and coherently. Their support allowed me to sharpen my focus for the journal, yet still meet the comprehensive standards required by my thesis. It felt so good to finally work with people who understand how to tactically approach even the fine issues of academic writing. Their input really added a layer to my work and made much difference in general terms of confidence.
No comments yet, come on and post~